4 MIN READ
The indie web has been declared dead so many times the obituary has become the running joke. Every few years a new cohort of writers, developers, and creators declare independence from the platforms, set up a blog and a newsletter, write for a few months, and quietly drift back to where the audience already is. The 2025-2026 cycle is riding a different wave than the ones before, and the difference is worth understanding for anyone thinking about publishing independently again.
What follows is the working version of the field guide. The shorter version is what the writer, the developer, the creator actually has time to read.
Why the cycle keeps repeating
Three drivers keep showing up, and the first is the one most people name. Platforms rot. The platform that started as the friendly home for the creator, the MySpace, the Tumblr, the early Twitter, eventually becomes the ad supported extraction machine. Algorithm shifts arrive next. Reach that took years to build gets cut to a tenth overnight when the platform changes the feed. The third driver is the inverse of the second: a new tool arrives, the static site generator, Substack, Ghost, WriteFreely, Bear blog, and a fresh cohort of creators picks it up and runs with it over a weekend. The new wave is always easier to start than the last one, which is partly why the cycle keeps coming back.
What is different this time
Three things have actually changed, and they are the reason this cycle is lasting longer than the previous ones. The email list is now portable. The writer can collect the audience on Substack or Ghost or Beehiiv, then take the list to the next platform when the current one disappoints. The platform cannot revoke an email address the way it can revoke a follower graph. ActivityPub federation is the second change. Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube all run on it, and a writer on one instance can reach the federated network without depending on any single platform’s algorithm. Direct payment is the third change. Stripe, Patreon, Ghost membership, all of them let the writer charge the reader without the platform taking a cut. The previous indie web cycles could not match this. This one can.
How to actually publish independently
Three moves matter, in roughly this order of how much each one decides whether the attempt lasts. Pick the tool you can run yourself. A static site on hardware you control, a self hosted Ghost, a plain old Bear blog, any of them will outlast the platform. The tool that requires the monthly subscription the platform could raise, the algorithm that could change, the platform that could shut down, is the tool to avoid. Own the email list. The list you can take to the next platform, the list the algorithm cannot reach, the list the platform cannot take away. The writer who publishes independently treats the email list as the most important asset they have. Publish on a schedule. A schedule the reader can rely on, a schedule that builds the habit, a schedule the previous indie web waves kept skipping. The writer, the developer, the creator who picks the right tool, owns the list, and ships on the schedule is the one who actually publishes independently. The rest are back on the platform within a year.
The bottom line
Own the tool, own the list, ship on a schedule. The creator who holds all three holds the audience. The one who skips them is back on the platform inside a year.
Sources & Further Reading
All claims in this article are sourced from primary documentation, vendor advisories, and reputable security researchers.
Spotted an error? Email the editor. Corrections are issued with a visible correction note.
Editorial standards. Every article on humanrequired.org is reviewed by a human editor before publication. AI may assist with drafting or research; final editorial control is human. Read the full standards.
