The state of IAM in Q2 2026 amounts to the state of an industry that has been promising identity first security for a decade and that has finally started to deliver on the promise. The delivery runs in the maturity of the cloud identity providers, the maturity of the federation standards, the maturity of the privileged access management market, the maturity of the non human identity tooling. The 2026 state of IAM stands as a state where the building blocks are in place and the work that remains amounts to the integration work.
Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, and the legacy on prem identity providers (Active Directory, OpenLDAP, FreeIPA) handle the user identity for the typical enterprise in 2026. The federation layer (SAML, OIDC, SCIM) handles the cross domain identity. The privileged access management market (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Delinea, Teleport) handles the privileged access. The non human identity tooling (the cloud workload identity, the SaaS identity, the API identity) handles the machine identity. The 2026 state of IAM amounts to a market that has the tooling, that has the standards, that has the cloud native options, and that has the work of integration that has not been done.
Where IAM is mature
Four areas, in roughly that order of how mature the tooling is. The first runs as the user identity area, where the cloud identity providers (Okta, Entra ID, Cloud Identity) handle 90% of the user identity use cases out of the box, with the remaining 10% covered by the legacy on prem providers and the federation layer. The second runs as the federation area, where SAML and OIDC handle the cross domain identity, with the federation standards mature, with the integration patterns well known, with the implementation effort predictable. The third runs as the privileged access area, where the PAM vendors (CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Delinea, Teleport) handle the privileged access use cases, with the session recording, the credential vaulting, the just in time access all mature features. The fourth runs as the cloud native identity area, where the cloud workload identity (AWS IAM Roles Anywhere, Azure Managed Identity, GCP Workload Identity Federation) handles the machine identity in the cloud, with the credential rotation automated, with the access managed by the cloud platform. The four areas together cover 80% of the IAM use cases.
Where IAM is still immature
Three areas, in roughly that order of how much work remains. The first runs as the SaaS identity area, where the SaaS applications (the 200+ SaaS apps the typical enterprise runs) each have their own identity model, each have their own federation story, each have their own privileged access model. The integration work across 200 SaaS apps runs as the work that has not been done. The second runs as the non human identity area, where the non human identities (the service accounts, the API keys, the OAuth applications, the machine credentials) outnumber the user identities by 10-50x in the typical enterprise, and the tooling to manage the non human identity runs less mature than the tooling to manage the user identity. The third runs as the legacy application area, where the legacy applications (the mainframe apps, the on prem databases, the custom internal tools) have identity models that predate SAML, that predate OIDC, that predate the modern federation standards. The three areas together represent the work that has not been done.
What to do about the integration work
Three moves if you are running the IAM program in 2026. Start with the inventory, because the inventory of the user identities, the non human identities, the SaaS identities, the legacy identities amounts to the foundation of the work. The inventory without the integration amounts to a list nobody acts on. Pick the integration pattern that fits your environment, because the integration pattern (the federation first approach, the privileged access first approach, the cloud native first approach) determines the order of the work. The enterprise that picks the pattern before the inventory runs the work without the direction. Build the team, because the IAM work requires the security engineers, the identity engineers, the cloud engineers, the application engineers, and the IAM work does not get done by any one of them alone. The enterprise that builds the cross functional team gets the work done. The enterprise that does not build the team has the work sit in the queue.
The bottom line
The state of IAM in Q2 2026 amounts to a state where the building blocks are mature and the integration work remains. The four mature areas (user identity, federation, privileged access, cloud native identity) cover 80% of the use cases. The three immature areas (SaaS identity, non human identity, legacy application identity) represent the work that has not been done. The IAM leader who starts with the inventory, picks the integration pattern, and builds the cross functional team stands as the leader who gets the integration work done.
Sources & Further Reading
All claims in this article are sourced from primary documentation, vendor advisories, and reputable security researchers.
Spotted an error? Email the editor. Corrections are issued with a visible correction note.
Editorial standards. Every article on humanrequired.org is reviewed by a human editor before publication. AI may assist with drafting or research; final editorial control is human. Read the full standards.
